@florian-duecker That’s great. Thanks!

@florian-duecker test123 🙂

edit: works

@MarPi said in Using NB-IOT for citizen-science:

Right - not right…to high - to low? It always depends. Which value exactly you doubt?
Or maybe there is a chance to improve your values?

The difference between nonIP and UDP is more than factor 2. The difference between nonIP and nonIP with RAI is negligible. This makes no sense. I suspect you used RAI for both nonIP cases?

To be fair, UDP + RAI will be in the area of fourhundred something.

I have achieved around 70 uWh (or 0.070 mWh) using nRF9160 using NB-IoT, UDP + RAI. 400 seems pretty high.

Hey @afzal_m,

Thanks for explaining. This helps.

Please consider making this a protocol when sending out emails about service interruptions (planned or not).

And please let us know what will happen with the sent data: Will devices need to send it again or will it arrive at our application after the update was successful?

Once we know this, we can tell our customers what to expect and how to act on degraded functionality,

@David-Thales I’m really looking forward to that!

@Stefan-de-Lange the PCBs for testing are open on Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
https://www.akoriot.com/akoriot_akor4range_l/
You have the freedom to copy it and re-measure it. But you will get the same result. Sometimes NB-IoT is better and sometimes LoRaWAN. You should also read before you judge something.

It seems the collection, can be found here

@Eben-van-Ellewee

This issue should be resolved now. All links are correctly pointing to the iotcreators.com domain.

@afzal_m So I’ll have to hold on the community package that I already have. But is there a chance that it will disappear completely in the future ? And would there be any benefit for me to go to one of the ‘paid’ packages ?

Hi, looks like it’s fixed. I can register it. Will try to connect.
Thanks, Joop!